Opens in a new tab

Redis Stubbing with Specmatic Contract Testing

Share this page

Check out the sample code

Sample files: https://github.com/specmatic/specmatic-redis-sample
Download Specmatic: https://docs.specmatic.io/download

Available in the Pro plan or higher

Transcript

Overview – how Specmatic can be used to stub out Redis

A typical HTTP consumer would send an HTTP request to an API where it is received by a controller. Let’s say the controller needs to fetch some data using a service object, and let’s say the service object looks up the data in an instance of Redis. Redis responds with the data, the service object returns it to the controller, and the controller uses the data to formulate a response to the consumer. This is how it works in production. But in test mode, things might be a little different. Let’s say there’s an OpenAPI specification for the API, and we feed it to Specmatic to run contract tests against the API. Instead of using an actual instance of Redis, we’ll stub it out and have the contract test set expectations so that the Redis stub knows what data to return for any query sent to it by the application. Now, when we run the contract tests and the service object does a look up in Redis, it’s actually hitting the Redis stub. The Redis stub responds and the service class understands it. None the wiser that it isn’t an actual instance of Redis.

The stub is wire compatible, so no changes are needed in the service class for this to work.

Specmatic Redis stub in action

Let’s take a sample API that needs Redis to function. Here’s the StoreController class using the StoreService object to look up some data.

The StoreService object, in turn, looks up Redis. We’re now going to run contract tests against this API using its API specification. The contract tests will be generated from the specification by Specmatic. The specification from which the contract tests are generated is in a central Git repository.

You can learn more about how Specmatic runs contract tests in a previous video.

Now, let’s run the contract tests. It won’t take long. Let’s take a look at the first test. Let’s scroll down a little in the logs. We can see a test here for a GET API to fetch the description of a store with ID 1. We get this response.

This description was provided by a Redis lookup. If we scroll up a little, we can see the log from the Redis tab showing the request that it received and the response that it returned. The stub itself is wire compatible. So the same code that talks to an actual Redis instance will talk to Specmatic’s Redis stub. But how did the stub know to return this response? Let’s dig a little deeper. Just after starting up the stubbed Redis instance, we set expectations on it.

For example, when it receives a GET operation with description hyphen 1, it should return this response, and so on. In fact, we can do dependency fault injection here. The Redis stub can simulate Redis errors to test that our application responds appropriately. The Redis stub setup is self contained within the test. The stub itself starts up within a millisecond. And this is all great because this test can easily run now in CI or even just locally on the laptop.

Available in the Pro plan or higher

Related Posts

api resiliency testing intro cutdown thumbnail

By Naresh Jain

Our API Ecosystem is More Fragile Than We Think

API resiliency testing: how to keep your services standing when dependencies fail The fragile truth about modern systems Resiliency matters, and yet we still underestimate
Read More
Demonstration of the flaws in grpc

By Naresh Jain

gRPC Flaws​ – The Illusion of Safety & Frustrating DevEx in Proto3’s Type-Safe Contracts​

Understanding the Shortcomings of gRPC and How Contract Testing Can Bridge the Gap  In the ever-evolving world of API design, development, and testing, the pursuit
Read More
testing 429 responses thumbnail

By Naresh Jain

When Dependencies Timeout, Does Your API Shed Load with 429 Responses?

When Dependencies Timeout: Engineering Tests that Produce a 429 response Simulating backend slowdowns and verifying that your API returns a proper 429 response is a
Read More
arazzo openapi asyncapi demo with specmatic

By Hari Krishnan

Authoring & Leveraging Arazzo Spec for OpenAPI & AsyncAPI Workflow Testing

Seamlessly test both synchronous and asynchronous APIs in realistic workflows before they ever hit production! Discover how combining OpenAPI and AsyncAPI specs can simplify complex
Read More
Kafka mocking

Kafka Mocking with AsyncAPI using Specmatic

The Specmatic Kafka mock is wire compatible and entirely within the control of the test, the test can run locally and in CI and deliver
Read More
Google PubSub contract tests

Contract Testing Google Pub/Sub: Using AsyncAPI specs as Executable Contracts

Shift-Left the identification of integration issues in applications built with Event Driven Architecture (EDA) by leveraging AsyncAPI specs as Executable Contracts Introduction The surge in
Read More
OpenAPI codegen docgen demo

By Naresh Jain

OpenAPI’s Broken Tooling: Roundtrip Fidelity Failure with CodeGen and DocGen​

Exploring the Strengths and Weaknesses of Automated API Development  Maintaining well-documented and reliable APIs is essential for any microservices development pipelines. At the heart of
Read More
JDBC stubbing with Redis and Specmatic contract testing.

Break the Chains of Database Dependencies: Leveraging Specmatic for JDBC Stubbing

With Specmatic JDBC stub, you can easily test APIs without the need for a complex database setup. By switching out the real database with a
Read More
GraphQL API resiliency testing

API Resiliency and Contract Testing for GraphQL

Transform your GraphQL API specs into executable contracts in seconds Now you can easily leverage your GraphQL APIs for contract testing, intelligent service virtualisation and
Read More
mcp auto test meet specmatic mcp auto test

By Yogesh Nikam

Testing MCP servers: How Specmatic MCP Auto-Test Catches Schema Drift and Automates Regression

We recently shared a hands-on walkthrough with Specmatic where we explored practical approaches for Testing MCP servers, and in this post we want to expand
Read More