Comparison: Specmatic vs WireMock

By Hari Krishnan

Share this page

This is the second post in our series where we compare Specmatic with tools that have some overlap in terms of capabilities. In our previous post we compared Specmatic and Pact. In this post we will be looking at WireMock.

We often need to mock APIs (both internal and external) to isolate the system under test or development so that we can make progress independent of dependencies. WireMock is a great tool if your goal is to just mock APIs. However API mocking is only effective if the mocks are truly representative of the provider / services they are emulating. Deviations between mocks and providers can lead to integration issues much later in the development cycle. In order to avoid such issues it is important to keep in mind that selecting an API mocking tool is not an isolated decision. It has to be in line with your overall microservices development, testing and deployment goals.

WireMock is an API Mocking tool and Specmatic is a Contract Driven Development tool that leverages API mocking (Smart Mocks) to identify contract compatibility issues in Consumers of an API. So this is not an apples to apples comparison. We are only going to look at a subset of capabilities where there are overlaps between Specmatic and WireMock. However if you believe we have missed any aspects in this comparison, please do leave us a comment.

Specmatic vs Wiremock

Capability	Specmatic	Wiremock
Approach	Contract-First/Specification-Driven Development Leverages API specifications (OpenAPI, gRPC proto, GraphQL schema, AsyncAPI, WSDL) as executable contracts Transforms API specs into tests and mocks automatically without writing code	Mock-First Approach Primarily focused on creating flexible API mocks and stubs Requires manual configuration of request-response mappings
Open Source	YES – MIT License • Fully open source CLI and core engine • Studio and Insights are commercial offerings	YES – Apache 2.0 License • Fully open source • WireMock Cloud is commercial offering
Language and platform agnostic	YES – Specmatic is primarily a standalone executable • JVM-based but runs independently • Docker images available • Language-agnostic approach • Kubernetes operator	YES Multiple Language Support • Java library (primary) • Python, .NET, Go, Rust adapters • Standalone JAR • Docker support
API Spec Support	Native Support • OpenAPI/Swagger • AsyncAPI • GraphQL Schema • gRPC Proto files • WSDL (SOAP) Specs are treated as executable contracts	Limited Support • Basic OpenAPI import (WireMock Studio) • Manual JSON mapping required • No native AsyncAPI support Primarily works with JSON request-response mappings
API Protocol Support	Multi-Protocol • HTTP/REST • gRPC • GraphQL • Kafka • JMS • Google Pub/Sub • JDBC • Redis (RESP) • SOAP	HTTP-Focused • HTTP/REST (Native) • SOAP (via HTTP) • gRPC (Extension) • GraphQL (Extension) • WebHooks/Callbacks Limited non-HTTP protocol support
Loading OpenAPI Specifications from Git Repo	YES – Direct Git integration • Pull latest OpenAPI specs directly from Git • Central Contract Repository support • Automatic spec synchronization • Version control integration	NO – No Direct Git Integration • Requires external utilities/scripts • Manual spec loading via Admin API May need shell scripts to pull specs from Git
Smart Mock	YES – Continuously Validates Against Specs • Auto-validates expectation data against OpenAPI specs • Prevents mock drift • Contract compliance enforcement • Breaking change detection Ensures mocks stay synchronized with API specifications	NO – No Automatic Validation • Mappings can go out of sync with API specs • No validation against OpenAPI specifications • Manual maintenance required Changes to mapping JSON not validated against specs
Provider Verification	YES – Contract Tests • Runs OpenAPI spec as contract tests • Verifies provider compliance with spec • Ensures provider-mock alignment • Automatic test generation	NO – Requires External Tools • Need integration with Dredd or PactFlow • Export stubbed endpoints as OpenAPI • Manual test setup required No built-in contract testing capabilities
API Specifications as Test #NOCODE	YES – Automatic Contract Tests • Auto-generated from API specs • No code required • Generative testing with edge cases • Backward compatibility validation Specifications become executable test suites automatically	NO – Manual Test Creation • Requires manual test writing • Custom verification code needed No automatic test generation from specifications
API Specifications as Mock #NOCODE	YES – Smart Service Virtualization • Auto-generated from API specs • Intelligent response generation • Protocol-aware mocking • Dynamic data generation Specifications become fully functional service mocks	NO – Manual Mock Configuration • Requires JSON stub mappings • Manual request-response definition • Template-based responses Flexible but requires manual configuration
Static Stubbing	YES – OpenAPI-based API Mocking • Unlimited expectations/canned responses • Response mappings with request matching • Spec-driven response generation • Contract validation	YES – Comprehensive Stubbing • WireMock Studio supports OpenAPI import • Faker-based generated responses • Modifiable response mappings No verification against OpenAPI spec compliance
Dynamic Stubbing	YES – HTTP API Support • Expectation JSON via HTTP API • Runtime stub modification • API-driven configuration • Real-time updates	YES – Admin API • Admin API mappings endpoint • POST mapping data dynamically • Runtime stub management • Full CRUD operations
DB / Storage Mocking	YES – Database Stubbing • JDBC stubbing • Redis (RESP) mocking • Database interaction virtualization • SQL query stubbing • JMS message stubbing Native support for database and storage mocking	NO – HTTP Only • No native database support • Only HTTP-based interactions Limited to HTTP protocol mocking
Delay Simulation	YES – Endpoint-Specific Delays • Simulate delays per endpoint • Request matching-based delays • Configurable latency patterns • Performance testing support	YES – Flexible Delay Options • Global or per-stub delays • Randomization support • Fixed and variable delays • Fault injection capabilities
GUI Based Visual #NOCODE Testing	YES – Specmatic Studio • Visual API workflow testing • No-code test configuration • Contract compliance validation • CI/CD integration • Docker Desktop Extension Complete visual interface for contract testing	PARTIAL – Limited GUI • WireMock Cloud (hosted version) • Basic web UI for standalone • Manual JSON configuration Primarily code/JSON-based configuration
Proxy-Based OpenAPI Generation & Validation	YES – Specmatic Proxy • Records requests/responses to generate OpenAPI specs • Generates stub data files • Continuously validates recorded responses against specs • Modifiable JSON stubs with spec verification Intelligent recording with contract validation	YES – Record & Playback • Records stub data • Export as OpenAPI specifications • HTTP traffic capture • Playback recorded interactions General-purpose HTTP recording capabilities
Proxying Requests	YES> – Spec-Aware Proxying • Handles requests matching OpenAPI specs • Proxies other requests to specified hosts • Contract-driven request routing • Selective proxy behavior	YES – Flexible Proxying • Selectively proxy requests to other hosts • Conditional proxying • Request/response modification • Proxy stub mappings
Contract Conformance Report	YES – Comprehensive Reports • API coverage analysis • Contract compliance reports • Backward compatibility reports • Test execution summaries Detailed insights into contract adherence and test coverage	PARTIAL – Basic Verification • Request verification reports • Mock usage statistics Limited reporting on contract compliance
Unfragmented Devex / Minimal learning curve	YES – You just need API Specification of your choice such as OpenAPI and Specmatic – no additional DSLs	NO – Depedency on other tools to achieve Provider Verification can complicate the tooling
SSL Support – Handling https requests	YES – Specmatic can generate self signed certs or you configure it to leverage your keystore	YES You configure it to leverage your keystore
	Specmatic.io	Wiremock.org

Comparison: Specmatic vs Spring Cloud Contract

With Spring Cloud Contract we can start by authoring the API contract in one of the supported DSLs, based on which the provider / producer

Comparisons, Demonstration, In the Media,

By John

Contract vs. Approval Testing: Identifying Bugs in RESTfulBooker’s API with Specmatic and TextTest

Testing APIs: Specmatic vs TextTest Emily Bache wanted to compare TextTest with Specmatic and has published a video about her experience: The BEST way to

Comparisons,

By Hari Krishnan

Comparison: Specmatic vs Pact.io and Pactflow.io

Specmatic and Contract Driven Development differ significantly from Pact. We built Specmatic out of our own necessity where Pact did not fit the bill for

Comparisons,

By Hari Krishnan

Specmatic vs Microcks

When evaluating tools for API testing and mocking, the choice often comes down to understanding not just what each tool can do, but how their

Comparisons,

By Naresh Jain

Playwright API Mocking and Specmatic: When and Why to Use Each

Playwright API mocking is a test-level capability designed to stub network calls within browser-based UI tests. Specmatic is a contract-driven API contract testing, simulation and validation platform designed

Comparison: Specmatic vs WireMock

Specmatic vs Wiremock

Related Posts

Comparison: Specmatic vs Spring Cloud Contract

Contract vs. Approval Testing: Identifying Bugs in RESTfulBooker’s API with Specmatic and TextTest

Comparison: Specmatic vs Pact.io and Pactflow.io

Specmatic vs Microcks

Playwright API Mocking and Specmatic: When and Why to Use Each